Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (110465)	5/11/2000 5:27:00 PM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579922

John re <<Q1 was really 1.05, not 1.15, because 0.10 were one time gains>> OK, I have been in a cave. What was the one time gain for? Mani

To: Petz who wrote (110465)	5/11/2000 5:52:00 PM
From: ptanner	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1579922

John - <That analyst report also made a point of saying that Q1 was really 1.05, not 1.15, because 0.10 were one time gains.... In fact, Goutama's contest results should probably be revised.> A countering change was the increase in shares from 152M -> 172M for the diluted EPS calculation. I was surprised this wasn't questioned more in the CC and I doubt anyone took this into account when making their estimates (I didn't). PT