Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ptanner who wrote (110480)	5/11/2000 6:04:00 PM
From: Petz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579983

pt, re:<the increase in shares from 152M -> 172M> Forgot that! Wowsers, that sure buried the 0.10. If we adjusted the contest for that, I imagine EVERYBODY was too pessimistic. Petz

To: ptanner who wrote (110480)	5/11/2000 6:45:00 PM
From: that_crazy_doug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579983

<< A countering change was the increase in shares from 152M -> 172M for the diluted EPS calculation. I was surprised this wasn't questioned more in the CC and I doubt anyone took this into account when making their estimates (I didn't). >> Interestingly enough AMD did their math wrong. income: $189,349,000 shares (diluted) 171,942,000 eps: $1.10 Interestingly, if you take the operating income, of about 180M, you do get $1.05 for operating profits. (which would fit with the $1.15 - .10), and then make the investment income only .05 and not .10 assuming the rest of my math is right Am I messing something up here?