SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : About that Cuban boy, Elian -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (4887)5/11/2000 11:50:00 PM
From: The Barracuda™  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9127
 
The people were against the Contras. It should be the people of a given nation that decide how they want to live- that's my opinion anyway

Like the Khmer Rouge or Nazi Germany for example.



To: epicure who wrote (4887)5/12/2000 12:13:00 AM
From: marcos  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9127
 
Yes, Tibet was a sovereign nation invaded by China ... but that didn't seem to bother Nixon much, he went ahead and did the ping-pong thing with the chinese. Really, i can't see what can be done about Tibet, China is too powerful and too strongly held by its dictatorship ... the Han chinese have been killing other cultures for their land for hundreds of years, as have the anglosaxon and the russian and the spanish and the french etc. Every few decades there is upheaval from within the chinese, perhaps next time human rights for tibetans will gain support.

The nicaraguan people ended up being against the sandinistas as well, so they voted them out ... the other X says above that Ortega's government was 'removed', well that was not the case, they lost an election [two now, actually] ... it's a long and complex story, and Nicaragua is still far from perfect, but imho Ortega's role in ridding the country of those pigs was a lot more useful to that particular slice of humanity than that of Reagan or his slushfund flunkey North or any of the murderers working for them.

There's so much hypocrisy out there. You can't impose freedom [even supposing we could all agree on what the word means][and supposing the spouters of the word 'freedom' really meant it] ... setting a good example would be so much more effective ... and that means not setting up puppet dictators, and not stealing people's kids.



To: epicure who wrote (4887)5/12/2000 10:24:00 AM
From: The Barracuda™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9127
 
There are places we SHOULD have intervened. Tibet is one of those places. FREE TIBET. No grey issues involved in that one. The Tibetans wanted to be free. We were too scared of China to help them. Shame on us and the rest of the world. There is a nation- a WHOLE nation- aggressed on. Talk about a lack of freedom.

Morally, other nations are able to intervene in Tibet, but they are not morally obligated to do so.