Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Solv Ex (SOLVD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WTMHouston who wrote (6693)	5/16/2000 9:59:00 PM
From: mqmsi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6735

Troy, Thanks for your response. I think Solv-Ex would be crazy to appeal this case. I have learned a lot about the law in following this stock, and although I don't necessarily agree with the law, it is the law, and everyone (except the Clintons) have to follow it. I have no argument with the decision whatsoever. I was never mislead by Rendall, but having a degree in chemical engineering, I knew the risk up front. But looking at it from the same perspective as a person who doesn't have the same technical knowledge, I have to agree the judge was correct in his assessment. I still believe that the Solv-Ex technology has a decent chance to succeed. Rendall and Campbell have to watch their P's and Q's in the future, but if they are what they said they are, they won't be affected by the shorts at all; it is only the people who were forced out of margin positions who will have a complaint about them. I know you don't care for Solv-Ex, but I believe that you are one of the few who are anti-Solv-Ex who have some credibility in what they say. Solv-Ex is not going to make me or break me, but I am sticking with it. Regards, Mark