Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (11207)	5/19/2000 3:00:00 PM
From: Ausdauer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 60323

Sam, We've been here before, but about 10 times worse. What doesn't kill me just makes me stronger. I understand that an Oppenheimer analyst totally deflated the stock today based on an interview on CNBC. When was the last time you heard someone come out positive on a stock's potential and in the same breath set a lower target price than the current deeply depressed market value? That is so patently absurd. We are over $110 points below the all-time high and she wants to punish the stock more. That is shameful. I would like to see her publish her buy transactions for the last few weeks and for the few weeks to follow. Just another clear cut example of how analysts will stoop to no end to establish a position. Where are Dan Niles and Mark Edelstone when we need them? Aus

To: Sam who wrote (11207)	5/19/2000 3:01:00 PM
From: Michael A. Gottesman	Respond to of 60323

More news from Court: Here's the latest - 5/11/00 244 STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer :extending time until 5/30/00 for Sandisk to file motions to compel (cc: all counsel) [3:98-cv-01115] (mcl) [Entry date 05/12/00] [3:98cv1115] 5/15/00 245 EXPEDITED MOTION before Judge Charles R. Breyer by defendant Lexar Media Inc in 3:98-cv-01115 for leave to file a motion for reconsideration Certificate of compliance and memorandum of points and authorities [3:98-cv-01115] (mcl) [Entry date 05/16/00] [3:98cv1115] 5/18/00 246 OPPOSITION by Plaintiff Sandisk Corporation in 3:98-cv-01115 to expedited motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration [245-1] [3:98-cv-01115] (mcl) [Entry date 05/18/00] [3:98cv1115] 5/18/00 247 DECLARATION by Steven S. Baik on behalf of Plaintiff Sandisk Corporation in 3:98-cv-01115 re opposition [246-1]FILED UNDER SEAL. [3:98-cv-01115] (mcl) [Entry date 05/18/00] [3:98cv1115] 5/18/00 248 PROOF OF SERVICE by Plaintiff Sandisk Corporation in 3:98-cv-01115 of declaration [247-1], opposition [246-1] 3:98-cv-01115] (mcl) [Entry date 05/18/00] [3:98cv1115] Looks like SNDK is trying to compel something (possible a deposition or documents) and were given til 5/30 to do so. Now Lexar wants the decision reconsidered. Mike