Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ben Wa who wrote (51404)	5/20/2000 8:24:00 PM
From: Eddy Blinker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

<<<<Having fewer kids is a long term positive, in that it is disinflationary and puts less strain on natural resources and is the single most important factor in keeping the earth from being trashed.>>>>> Message 13742686 >=1/3 of kids born in hospitals in Los Angeles are born to folks who are not in the US legally. Ben, When posters are using big words normally reserved for "globalists" and the political correct elite, like "changing demographics" or "disinflationary" I get interested in the subject. As from a HHS point of view, since there are about 2 1/2 million of persons of all ages and gender sleeping in "boxes" in the US of which about 80.000 are located in the LA region *and taking your established view about "trashing the earth" in consideration. I asked You: Are the -/+ 80.000 adults looking nightly for a bed to sleep in LA, legally in the US? Or should I have been more blunt and ask you if you consider those 80000, regardless if they are legal or not in LA as contributors to US inflation as you seem to rate the few hundred "ba-bas", blessed to be born in LA hospitals? You get my drift, brother Ben?<g> Regards, ED