Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Why did the chicken cross the road? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 3:41:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Pierre de Fermat I just don't have room here to give the full explanation...

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 3:42:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Plato For the greater good.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 3:43:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Sir Isaac Newton Chickens at rest tend to stay at rest. Chickens in motion tend to cross the road.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 3:44:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Omar Khayyam The moving chicken fingers write and having writ, move on.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 3:45:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Moses Know ye that it is unclean to eat the chicken that has crossed the road, and that the chicken that crosseth the road doth so for its own preservation.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 3:46:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Robert Frost To cross the road less traveled by.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 3:53:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Robert Frost To cross the road less traveled.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 3:58:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

COBOL Programmers 0001-CHICKEN-CROSSING. IF NO-MORE-VEHICLES THEN PERFORM 0010-CROSS-THE-ROAD VARYING STEPS FROM 1 BY 1 UNTIL ON-THE-OTHER-SIDE ELSE GO TO 0001-CHICKEN-CROSSING

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 3:59:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Ayn Rand A chicken's first duty is to itself. And only by living for itself is it able to achieve the things which are the glory of chickenkind. Such is the nature of achievement.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 4:22:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Arthur, King of the Britons: To seek the Holy Grail.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 4:22:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Molly Bloom: The chicken crossed the road well Poldy I dont know why why do you worry about such stupid bloody things O speaking of stupid bloody things here it comes again damn it its only been three weeks I wonder is there something wrong with me yes.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 4:24:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Boston Market, Inc.: Chicken is no longer in our name. Please refer to our SEC filing.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 4:26:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Buddha: If you ask this question, you deny your own chicken-nature.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 4:27:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

George Bush: To face a kinder, gentler thousand points of headlights.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 4:54:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Richard Milhouse Nixon: I'm glad you asked me about that. This is what I have to say about that. My wife Pat and I only eat good, Republican chickens. Cooked in a good, Republican pot. Hey, is this (expletive deleted) mike live yet? Richard Milhouse Nixon: That part of the conversation was accidentally erased. Richard Milhouse Nixon: The chicken did not cross the road. I repeat, the chicken did NOT cross the road.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 4:55:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Oliver North: National Security was at stake.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 4:56:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Camille Paglia: It was drawn by the subconscious chthonian power of the feminine which men can never understand, to cross the road and focus itself on its task. Hens are not capable of doing this-their minds do not work that way. Feminism tries vainly to pretend there is no real difference between them, falsely following Rousseau. But de Sade has proved....

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 4:57:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Catherine McKinnon: Because, in this patriarchial state, for the last four centuries, men have applied their principles of justice in determining how chickens should be cared for, their language has demeaned the identity of the chicken, their technonogy and trucks have decided how and where chickens will be distributed, their science has become the basis for what chickens eat, their sense of humor has provided the framework for this joke, their art and film have given us our perception of chicken life, their lust for flesh has has made the chicken the most consumned animal in the US, and their legal system has left the chicken with no other recourse.

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 4:59:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

John Lennon: Imagine there is no chicken, it's easy if you try...

To: mr.mark who wrote (4)	5/21/2000 5:00:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Respond to of 154

Tom Lehrer: Got me. I gave up animal husbandry years ago. I was afraid they'd catch me at it.