Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Seagate Technology - Fundamentals -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MikeM54321 who wrote (1849)	5/23/2000 9:30:00 AM
From: Robert Douglas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1989

Mike, How come I haven't gotten a proxy in the mail? And did anyone else get this, "Don't ask me, I only work here," response from the SEC? Thanks. -MikeM(From Florida) Not surprising. I thought that the SEC would prove to be a dead end. The SEC doesn't care if Seagate management cuts itself a sweetheart deal as long as all the "I"s are dotted and "T"s are crossed. You can bet that Luczo and his team were very careful in these matters. I don't suppose the private lawsuits will be any more effective. The only way to stop this will be for a the shareholders to turn it down. If they don't then management cannot be sued for buying something that the owners agreed to sell to them. Will the proposal pass? I still think it will. Every day we get more evidence that Seagate's core business is more and more valuable. The latest evidence being IBM's problems in the 10K drives. I'll bet management is counting the days until they can ride off free and clear with their booty. OT --- By the way, you sure are becoming famous with all your posts getting spotlighted by SI. Do you still talk to us little folk?