SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: werefrog who wrote (45191)5/24/2000 11:27:00 AM
From: Harvey Allen  Respond to of 74651
 
Jackson will be weighing the government's breakup proposal against Microsoft's, which would
merely restrict its business practices. The judge is not obliged to accept either proposal,
wholly or in part.

Rich Gray, an intellectual property attorney with Outside General Counsel Silicon Valley in
Menlo Park, Calif., said there is another possibility, similar to the movie "The Verdict," where at
the end of the trial the jury asks the judge if it can award more damages than the plaintiff
sought.

"The equivalent of that moment for Microsoft's attorneys would be if Judge Jackson came in
and said, 'I think the government's approach is too lenient, and I agree with the Brookings
Institution on where we go from here," Gray said.

Brookings Institution fellow Robert Litan has advocated a more serious remedy of breaking
Microsoft into four companies, or "baby Bills," with three devoted to the Windows family.

news.cnet.com



To: werefrog who wrote (45191)5/24/2000 12:52:00 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
I'm amazed that you consider the NYT more authoritative than Microsoft itself. Or are you calling Gary a liar?