SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mozek who wrote (45204)5/24/2000 1:41:00 PM
From: JC Jaros  Respond to of 74651
 
Hey, speaking of 'providing the source' mozek, that'd probably go a little ways toward helping make Windows more secure (IMO). -JCJ



To: mozek who wrote (45204)5/24/2000 3:25:00 PM
From: cheryl williamson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
mozek,

Fred Cohen is not the person you want to quote in
a post. There is a enormous difference between
file system security in Unix & in Windows. He
obviously doesn't know that. If you don't know
the difference in the file systems, I suggest you
take a course in beginning Unix to find out.

Basic to all Unix O/S's is a permissions mask that
applies to ALL files in the file system. No virus
that doesn't have owner or group rights to a file
will ever be able to do anything to it unless the
user specifically allows read/write access to the
outside world. It's not a perfect security, but
it's MUCH more robust than Windows, which has NO
security AT ALL. Any file on your Windows 98 O/S
can be destroyed by any process running in memory.
There is simply no security built-in.

Another thing: IE crammed into the O/S is a security
no-no. Netscape runs in User space and cannot by
definition gain direct access to any peripheral devices
or network drivers, or the keyboard etc. even if it's
running on a PC, which makes a good case for Linux.
In Unix, user processes don't have that priviledge,
so that protects the O/S and your sensitive data.

Tell Fred Cohen to go take some computer classes and
stop polluting the internet with his false statements.
The guy is just plain ignorant.

BTW: just what kind of a "study" are you looking for.
It's common knowledge that Windows viruses are the
ones everyone gets hurt by. So, if there are only
42,000 rather than 45,000 in the last 12 years that
negates this guys "sensational quote"?????

Even the M$FT security guru didn't dispute the figures,
mozek. Instead he quoted the bank robber Willie Sutton.

I'll restate my proposal, which I like: a consortium
should buy out M$FT stock, gut the company, fire the
management, replace Windows for free with Linux and
port all apps to Unix using current M$FT apps software
engineers.

cheers,
cherylw