Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : NewKidCo International (OTC:NKCIF) (TSE:NKC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: esecurities(tm) who wrote (4046)	5/24/2000 7:55:00 PM
From: esecurities(tm)	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4231

Re: NewKidCo's ("ONGOING CONCERN") status: AS A MATTER OF RECORD appx 1 hour and seven minutes after our previous post ref/ Message 13770799 at appx 5:55 PM EDT NewKidCo CEO Richard Rabins advised esecurities corporation through one of its Company email addresses ijournalist@channelw.net that he is sending "...a package tonight that ought to answer your questions..." Again, this was a TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE marked substantive material question of overwhelming shareholder importance which simply required a simple and [timely] "Yes" or "No", either via said return email, and or by a simple return phone call on Monday 22 May 2000 as represented by Steve Schneider, CFO on 17 May or ... ref/ NewKidCo viz a viz FASB/U.S. GAAP Definition of ("ONGOING CONCERN") In Re: biz.yahoo.com and biz.yahoo.com . We will continue to advise this NewKidCo shareholder thread accordingly. /s/esecurities corporation Beneficial [Long] shareholders (NASD OTC BB:NKCIF)(TSE:NKC) CORRECTION: "quid pro quo" NOT "quid quo pro" ref/ previous post.

To: esecurities(tm) who wrote (4046)	5/25/2000 12:15:00 AM
From: Tom Jordan	Respond to of 4231

Well what is it? We worked closely with them? Well, it was somewhat close. How about: we tried to help, where we could, at arms length of course, but they wouldn't listen...... Is it safe to say that you may have overstated your contribution to the team? Make up your mind. >>NewKidCo management whom has taken this personally and apparently has allegedly recklessly enlisted yourself unwittingly? and unfortunately as their spokesman? In our experience this generally is quid quo pro protocol with a management team allegedly responsible for alleged avoidable consistent patterns of shareholder value destruction.<< Now here is a concept; they are so incompetent they hired me to post to you! (true, I am not the sharpest pencil in the drawer) And you may own more of this stock than anyone else on the street! So really, you're paying me to do this. Talk about irony! Like I said, your allegations are getting wilder. I have not been enlisted by NKC or anyone related to it. I am a shareholder and I post under my real name. I post to you because I do not support or agree with your criticisms of management and your relentless whining about "alleged shareholder value destruction". I am merely adding balance to your severely biased contribution to this thread, and it seems my needles are pricking effortlessly into your unweathered flesh. >>We do what we can..........on behalf of all non-insider shareholders.<< I thank you in advance for striking my name from the list of those you purport to represent. It might be an idea to check with the other shareholders as well. tj. ps. Just curious, but why is it that Jim answers my posts to you and you answer my posts to Jim? You guys room mates?