Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : JDS Uniphase (JDSU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pat mudge who wrote (10484)	5/24/2000 8:16:00 PM
From: t2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24042

Pat, I would just avoid that post. You are one of the best contributors on this thread...and a JDSU bull.

To: pat mudge who wrote (10484)	5/24/2000 9:08:00 PM
From: SJS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24042

Pat, I think he was referring to the long set of posts regarding Gilder. That was "tame" compared to some discussions we've had in the past. However, I think the crack was more focussed one of SI's newest "young bucks" and JDSU's newest prolific poster. If people don't appreciate your continuous hard work, then they can ignore your posts. And I'm another owner of this stock when most thought "optical" was the glasses department at SEARS, thought DWDM was something in the personal ads, or could even spell Uniphase. <VBG> Regards, Steve

To: pat mudge who wrote (10484)	5/26/2000 10:01:00 PM
From: feminvstr	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 24042

I've been fascinated by Pat Mudge and her interest in stocks that she does not own! Is it an obsession to prove Gilder wrong or ?? These are posts with many links painting a rather compelling story about TERN and perhaps the players behind the class action law suit. Pay attention to the dates of many of the links and the dates which many posts where prior to the class action law suit. To those who dont understand here is a post I recently did in summary and defense of the information on the Raging bull board. By: feminvstr Reply To: 4008 by mensa1t Friday, 26 May 2000 at 10:04 AM EDT Post # of 4021 MENSA, you obviously do not understand the information being posted here re. PLUVIA, ANTHONY and PAT MUDGE. It is vital as to the future health of TERN and understanding the players and motivation of the class action lawsuit. Instead of posting old posts it would behoove you to read all of what GOP is posting. For all new investors that have questions as to the validity of the claims, GOPBABE has shown compelling reasons to believe that the lawsuit may have been malicious and self profiting, benefiting the above mentioned persons. You are viewing these posts as negative and non productive regarding TERN it's quite the contrary proving that a competitors share holder of CMTO may have been the one behind the frivolous claims. suspicious to say the least. Now read for yourself and draw your own conclusions. GO to the link below and read the post numbers listed ragingbull.com. Raging Bull TERN Post #3998 Raging Bull TERN Post #3893 Raging Bull TERN Post #4007 Raging Bull TERN Post #4005 GOOD BUYS AND GOOD WEEKEND TO ALL KIMBERLY