Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Flag Resources (FGR.A A) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jbr29 who wrote (3241)	5/25/2000 5:48:00 PM
From: Bill Pieper	Respond to of 4269

Where in the original NR is the word "large"? I cannot find any word "large" in the original News Release posted here by Just G (post#3224). The corrected NR from Yahoo said: < /C O R R E C T I O N -- Flag Resources (1985) Limited/ In c8316 issued at 12:04 today, an error occurred in the second paragraph after the table. The word ``large'' should have been omitted. It should have read ``The mineralized gabbro structure...''. Corrected copy follows:....> Here is the original NR: < The mineralized gabbro structure is located 3,000 feet southwest of the Rathbun Lake Occurrence, a surface lens of massive sulphides.> Where is the word "large"? It isn't there, or I can't read! What the hell is going on here??? Why correct something that is nonexistent in the original release anyway? And the original NR used g/t for all values of gold,platinum, and palladium, why not mention that correction to grains/tonne from g/t applying to gold and platinum? Another NR F**KUP?! No wonder the stock price fell today! Jeez, now I'm bashing too! Oh, oh, now xxxx is going to bash me back now. It's ok, xxxx, go ahead and bash me good, I deserve it!!! I'm a moron too for buying more Flag at 0.82, now worth half that share price!!!! Ouch, ouch, ouch, ouch, ...... come on xxxx, not so hard!!! ouch, ouch oooowwwwhhhh, ouch!

To: jbr29 who wrote (3241)	5/25/2000 6:40:00 PM
From: Berry Picker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4269

The whole thing is a printing error... Stockwatch did not have "grains" of anything. Canada Newswire has "Grains" for the first two columns. People sold off their stock for nothing today. The hole that was reported today was the "discovery" hole. It was drilled where they found the surface showing and it was chosen before the IP was done which showed better where the "metallic" are concentrated. It was merely to prove that we have "economic" rock but with it being reports as "grains" rather than Grams people flipped out and sold. I would be very angry if I was one who sold and found out it was a printing error but thems the breaks I guess. I did not know what the heck Ptask was talking about until someone told me about the report being differently on Canada newswire. It is a very unfortunate situation to say the very least. What should have been encouraging astounded people at how silly Murdo MUST be to even bother reporting what appeared to be trace minerals - all because a reporting error. Whose fault??? I am curious how exactly this happened at all !! It will cost everyone who sold a loss of MONEY. What would I do it I had sold off by "accident"?? I would probably be too mad to buy it back and then when it went up I would be even more angry... NOT A GOOD SITUATION AT ALL !!!