To: Anonymous who wrote (14893 ) 7/20/2000 7:01:52 PM From: Anonymous Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21876 "A lôôk back to hard times in the past when LUCY was this low.... 2/9/1999 = 96 (split adjusted = 48) 2/12/1999 = 96 1/4 (split adjusted = 48 1/8) 2/17/1999 = 96 1/4 (split adjusted = 48 1/8) 3/24/1999 = 98 1/2 (split adjusted = 49 1/4) 1/6/2000 = 52 1/18/2000 = 50 1/2 1/19/2000 = 51 7/16 2/16/2000 = 52 1/8 2/17/2000 = 53 1/2 2/18/2000 = 52 1/4 2/22/2000 = 52 3/4 2/23/2000 = 52 7/8 4/13/2000 = 53 1/2 4/14/2000 = 52 5/24/2000 = 53 1/2 5/25/2000 = 52 1/5"... and today, 7/20/2000, it bounced off an intraday low of 51 3/16 to close at (last trade at 6:27 PM according to the Realtime quote feature) what looks like 54 3/16...down 10 5/16 they say. A total of 85,333,000 shares traded. I hope they're done now and we don't get clipped tomorrow?... Of course there were lower intraday lows...where are we going from here...up I hope!...isn't that the way it goes...everything that goes down must go up^^^it did the last time I posted this information back on 5/25/2000...is this just a case of dejavu? I think we're in for a very long and frustrating next six months...and to be even more realistic, maybe even nine months cause we've already been told what to lôôk out for in the next two earning periods...the next quarter will be flat and wont do anything since to boost investor confidence since he said he was being up front and honest to gain back the STREETS confidence...and the next quarter after that will be the same as the fourth (flat) so nothing can happen, can it? We're all going to be waiting with baited breath for the April 2001 results before we'll have anything to cheer about...if we're lucky. Saw Rich on CNBC this afternoon in an interview with David Faber and if there was someone who was having trouble trying not to look like a scared rabbit , a disheveled CEO, a person having trouble trying to pull the wool, it were him, Jezebel...it were him!.....Anon