Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Anthony Returned the Donation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Bob who wrote (75)	5/26/2000 11:13:00 AM
From: knows_picker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 445

SI Bob, why the double standard here?...and elsewhere? why are the relentless personal attacks on Anthony allowed? is it because Anthony doesnt pump?

To: SI Bob who wrote (75)	5/26/2000 12:02:00 PM
From: dkgross	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 445

not to be a pain in the ass, but this just seems like overreacting. Take a look through the ECNC thread from mid March when all hell was breaking loose. Why were Pluvia and Anthony give total free reign and allowed their personal barage of insults on the ECNC thread without any repremands

To: SI Bob who wrote (75)	5/27/2000 1:33:00 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 445

SI Bob, You obviously monitor certain threads connected to a certain fallen guru and his lemmings. Why is it that you allow the profanity, the personal attacks, the constant "pos" attacks, the vitriolic posts that are not factual? I think it's time you set the record straight. What is the policy? When is it enforced? Can more than one individual post under an SI name? Is it spamming to do this to promote a private site? Do those who get paid per post risk your ire? Similarly, when a short brags about "creating volume" and then realizes that perhaps that could be interpreted as manipulative and violative of SEC regs, how is that he is allowed to have that post deleted? I've recently been PM'd by certain individuals who claim to have knowledge that someone with your moniker had access to the "Private Site", the one that apparently charges $600/month for participation, and which is promoted on these threads. These PM's, as well as some posters on Raging Bull, claim that this perhaps has influenced your views. (I assume there is only one SI Bob but I realize that this may not be the case. Perhaps that one deserves a clarification also.) I hope that in the interest of full disclosure you will respond and not simply delete this post. I agree with your post and would love to have the tone of these boards become civil. I have no problem with shorting. It's the attacks and the attempts to scare shares out of longs with personal attacks and unfair methods that bothers me. That's why it's so nice to say, "What goes around, comes around."