SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wily who wrote (103725)5/27/2000 4:28:00 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Still, one wonders
what advantage Intel would have if cumines w/2MB L2 were competing against Athlons with 2KB L2.


That would be hard to test as there never have been any Athlon's with 2KB L2 cache.

Tim



To: wily who wrote (103725)5/27/2000 5:50:00 PM
From: deibutfeif  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Wily,

FWIW, I still think you are missing what might be even more valuable to the market: an instant-on PC. If you've ever used a laptop, you know the irritation of waiting on it to be ready to work. Even the so-called suspend modes require too much time to unsuspend AND they burn up power anyway.

Your OUM (if viable and cost effective) could solve this problem, making a much more desirable end product. And using it for this purpose (replacing DRAM) would not require process compatibility with the host processor (which replacing on-chip cache does).

JMHO,

~dbf



To: wily who wrote (103725)5/27/2000 5:56:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: "Thus, if Intel had exclusive rights to OUM, they would be sittin' pretty..."

I thought you said Intel had a non exclusive license?

EP