SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (114236)6/5/2000 1:46:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576972
 
Elmer,

Intel built their own SRAMs for their Xeon systems up to 550MHz and they probably needed leading edge process technology.

Wow! 550 MHz is a full speed Xeon cache!

Intel has decided to temporarily suspend shipments of Boxed Intel© Pentium© lll Xeon? processors 933, 866, 800, 733, 667, 600 MHz with 256k on-die L2 cache (prior code name: Cascades) to Intel Authorized Distributors. This notice does not impact shipments of Boxed Intel Pentium lll Xeon processors 550 MHz

theregister.co.uk

I told this thread last year that you would never see an Athlon with full speed L2 due to manufacturing limitations. A particularly ignorant poster on this thread disagreed but he was wrong on most other things as well.

I'll be looking forward to seeing that post. ;^))

Scumbria



To: Elmer who wrote (114236)6/5/2000 8:35:00 AM
From: wily  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576972
 
Elmer,

Scumbria said: Transfering the data from the cache to the CPU is a big problem. Also, SRAMs are not built in the same leading edge process as the CPU

Elmer said: Not true. Intel built their own SRAMs for their Xeon systems up to 550MHz and they probably needed leading edge process technology.


How could there be a controversy as to who manufactured the SRAM on an Intel cpu wafer? Does this mean Intel ships their wafers to an SRAM manufacturer?

wily