Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (104183)	6/7/2000 10:29:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "I doubt that. I think there is enough common components / challenges that there would have to be plenty of internal communications between the groups that Luis Burns would have to know about it." Maybe he does know about it. The quote from him was that there was no DDR chipset on his roadmap. You were willing to accept his being a liar as one possibility, why not accept that there could be someone else inside Intel doing a chipset as another possibility? Re: "Intel supposedly licensed Willamette bus to ServerWorks, to there will be a DDR chipset for Foster, even if Intel slips, but as far as I know, Intel did not license Willamette bus to anybody else, so Via (or Sis, Ali) won't be there to bail out the Microproce$$or group from the mistakes of the chipset group." Not having a valid license didn't stop Via in the past. Why would they let it stop them now? EP