SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pluvia who wrote (43745)6/8/2000 2:00:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 93625
 
Pluvia, <There's a big difference between identifying a failing product and picking an entry price to trade a stock. Carl's fundamental analysis of RMBS seems very accurate IMO.>

This is "Silicon Investor," not "Tom's Hardware Guide." The ultimate goal is to make money on stocks. No matter how accurate (or deceiving, depending on your point-of-view) Carl's technical analysis is, you have to admit that he failed miserably when he said RMBS was overvalued at $68 a share. Only NOW when the stock is in the 200 range does he come out and say that the stock movement has little to do with the technology. Very poor timing.

Tenchusatsu



To: Pluvia who wrote (43745)6/8/2000 2:29:00 PM
From: John Erb  Respond to of 93625
 
You sound like a guy who doesn't no how to spell. <g>

>>>You sound rather like the typical long who has know idea why he owns a stock, and thinks DD is a bra size of girls who always seem to ignore him...<<<



To: Pluvia who wrote (43745)6/8/2000 2:38:00 PM
From: blake_paterson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
<<You sound rather like the typical long who has know idea why he owns a stock, and thinks DD is a bra size of girls who always seem to ignore him..>>

Your mastery of the English language leads one to conclude that you have very little to contribute to this board.

BP



To: Pluvia who wrote (43745)6/9/2000 2:50:00 AM
From: Dave B  Respond to of 93625
 
Pluvia,

Let me add to Tenchusatsu's statement to you that "you have to admit that he [Carl] failed miserably when he said RMBS was overvalued at $68 a share" by pointing out that he also failed miserably when he said that RDRAM would never work in a socketed configuration.

Is this who you want to rely on for technical advice?

Dave