SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (104252)6/8/2000 8:11:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Ten, thanks for getting back. >Elmer is right, in my opinion. Intel's mistake isn't necessarily supporting RDRAM in the first place. Intel's mistake was not having an alternative SDRAM platform available. That should be fixed once the 815E chipset is launched this month.

Now, tell me again. What processors will use the 815E chipset? Does it have native support for SDRAM (no MTH)?

While I'm here, again on Willamette, it sounds like, to this point, we don't know of any non-Rambus DRAM support. Is that right?

I need to visit the Intel roadmap website soon, see what's there.

Thanks,

Tony



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (104252)6/9/2000 2:50:00 AM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tenchusatsu,

Most of the performance benchmark comparisons out there pair up the GHz Pentium III with an 820/RDRAM platform. Meanwhile, the Athlon is still stuck with PC133 SDRAM.

I think Tony was talking more in terms of practical use than the theoretical < 1% lead of one processor over another. If you upgrade to 1 GHz CPU, be it Intel or AMD, you will get a lot more powerful machine (maybe 100% faster) than what you currently have, and the +/- 1% is not going to make than much difference, except some bragging rights.

Intel's mistake isn't necessarily supporting RDRAM in the first place. Intel's mistake was not having an alternative SDRAM platform available.

I don't know which memory standard will win eventually, but I think the mistake Intel made was to commit to Rambus too early, before Rambus was ready for prime time. I think Intel should have waited for Rambus to prove itself in other devices, before bringing it to main memory of a PC.

Joe