Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pgerassi who wrote (115385)	6/11/2000 12:28:00 AM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583681

Re: "Tbird out runs Cmine using same NB except for FSB. Cmine is about 10 to 20% slower when comparing apples to apples" Pete, there are perhaps 25 benchmarks and you have presented none. I find it quite reveling that AMD still is too embarrassed to post SPEC95 or SPEC2000 scores. At least they deserve credit for giving up their falsifications of Intel FP scores and their lying about compilers. Instead they've just refused to post SPEC scores at all, rather than be humiliated. Re: "The peak yield of Cmine is still 650 to 700Mhz" May I remind you that you are misusing the term "yield", which refers to good/bad with no regard to speed. You are instead referring to binsplit and I wish I could tell you how ridiculous this statement is. You guys seem to believe that the CPUs available at the CPU fleamarket are a true indicator of what's shipping. EP