SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mozek who wrote (46418)6/11/2000 3:10:00 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
"Neukom: ... There is nothing that we didn't want in evidence that's not on the record."

I guess the DOJ did a pretty good job.

;-)



To: mozek who wrote (46418)6/11/2000 3:26:00 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
The "Talkback" to that article is interesting. A few years ago, it seemed like any criticism of Microsoft was met with a barrage of responses in support of Microsoft. There were only a few voices in the wilderness expressing concern about Microsoft and its business practices. Now the weight of public comment seems to be shifting, so that positive commentary about Microsoft is met with a barrage of counterpoint. The masses have been emboldened!

JMHO.



To: mozek who wrote (46418)6/11/2000 9:17:00 PM
From: Harvey Allen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
Mozek- I suppose Neukom is so certain that Microsoft never broke any laws because employees and executives are so well versed on the law.

Read about Intel's policy on antitrust training

''What we decided was, we've got to play this very carefully,'' Grove said.

The company started hiring antitrust experts to master the relevant laws. It
wasn't just a matter of beefing up the legal department. Intel's executives and
sales people were also taught the new rules of engagement.

Intel went so far as to hire attorneys to browbeat employees. ''People knew
what cross-examination was like,'' said Grove. ''We brought in outside lawyers
to take mock depositions.'' They weren't gentle about it, either. The sessions
left many an Intel executive sweaty and terrified.

. . . . . . . .

So when the Federal Trade Commission launched an antitrust investigation of
Intel a couple of years ago, the company didn't rant or rail or vow to fight to the
last ditch. Instead, it settled. End of story.


digitalmass.com

Then compare it to Microsoft's antitrust education (hint none) and you may come to the conclusion that Neukom is full of hot air.

Harvey



To: mozek who wrote (46418)6/11/2000 11:47:00 PM
From: Harvey Allen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
re: MS legal chief: 'It was theater, not law'

You might want to compare the Neukom article with this one about David Boies:

newsweek.com