Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (46554)	6/13/2000 3:37:00 PM
From: mozek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74651

Jackson is making moves that make sense only as tactics to be used by a plaintiff, not standard procedure for an impartial judge working within the system. In fact, they were scripted by the DOJ. He's clearly decided that he'll deny the stay, but is unwilling to do so because he doesn't want the legal system to work the way it should. Instead, he wants to leapfrog the appeals court at all costs, hoping that he can support the DOJ goals regardless of impropriety, due process, or ethical considerations. I would be surprised if these kinds of moves are lost on the higher courts as well. This is par for the course with him, and like most of his other clearly biased moves will soon be forgotten or ignored by anti-Microsoft people on this board who will refer to him as "impressive" and "impartial". These kind of antics on the part of an individual whose objectivity is supposed to serve as a pillar of our constitutional structure should be highly illegal, not just unethical. Mike