Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (370)	6/16/2000 6:34:00 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 12465

Just received the Decision by Court: It is ordered and Adjudged that the defendant D. Todd(sic)Pauly's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is GRANTED. Judgement is hereby entered in favor of the defendant Pauly and against the plaintiff. The case filing states the following: ...All causes of action asserted against Defendant D. Tod Pauly are DISMISSED. DATED: June 14, 2000 Philip M. Pro United States District Judge In the case of Jeffrey Mitchell: "The court finds that an exercise of jurisdiction based soley on such an attentuated contract with the State of Nevada would offend "traditional notions of substantial justice and fair play." Finally the Court rejects Plaintiff's argument that by challenging certain evidence as fabricated, Defendant Mitchell has somehow subjected himself to the jurisdiction of this Court. Indeed, given the Court's finding that it lacks jurisdiction over Defendant Mitchell, the Court concludes it is unnecessary to address the issue of whether evidence was fabricated by Plaintiff. Again the decision signed by Judge Pro ends basically with the same wording for Jeffrey. Regarding Janice: On March 23, 2000 Defendant Janice Shell filed a Motion for Consideration on Briefs Only (#11) A review of the Court's file indicates that Plaintiff has failed to file a Response in opposition to Defendant's Motion. Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 7-2(d) of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Plaintiff consents to the granting of the Motion. It is THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Janice Shell's Motion for Consideration on Brief's only(#11) is granted. There is much to sumarize regarding the case, the affidavits, evidence, decisions...and will do so later for public knowledge. Transcribed as received.