Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ztect who wrote (35701)	6/20/2000 11:45:00 AM
From: ztect	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

>-----Original Message----- >From: :ztect@hotmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 11:40 AM >To: gz@pronetlink.com >Cc: info@pronetlink.com >Subject: Please Read....and....Respond. Glenn, Sorry, I did not receive your email on 6/12 Thank you for your reply. I have no agenda. I have noted the scale of your undertaking, your low burn rate, and your being ahead of the proverbial eight ball in turns of implementation. You wrote, "proven you wrong" which is ironic since I have written repeatedly in the past supporting what you're trying to achieve. But now when I question what you had told me previously, which contradicted your phased approached to growing revenues, I'm now a "basher". My problems are with the strength of streams to spin the waterwheel to generate enough electricity ie. revenues to outpace increasing marketing and operating costs to acutally make money ie. EARNINGS. Please read these links to better understand my point of view, Message 13907993 Message 13898753 Message 13898728 Then please agree or disagree Sincerely, Xxxxx "ztect" Xxxxx xxx-xxx-xxxx