SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (116812)6/20/2000 11:40:00 PM
From: kapkan4u  Respond to of 1571398
 
<crazyoldman, consider the situation. Intel's current 6th generation processor is neck 'n neck with AMD's newest 7th+ generation processor at 1 GHz. Intel has spent 4-5 years developing a new generation processor.>

It is more like 6-7 years, but who is counting. If it was 9-10 years it would really kick @$$.

BTW, i432, i860, i960, iTanic, iTimmy, i820, i840 iRDRAM, (sure I forgot a bunch more) were all next generation thingy.

Kap



To: Elmer who wrote (116812)6/20/2000 11:51:00 PM
From: crazyoldman  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571398
 
Elmer,

Re: crazyoldman, consider the situation. Intel's current 6th generation processor is neck 'n neck with AMD's newest 7th+ generation processor at 1 GHz. Intel has spent 4-5 years developing a new generation processor. Someone has suggested that it might be no faster than a 550MHz Celeron. You think I might be gullible for suggesting that this is ridiculous? Is this really the position you want to take?


To put it bluntly, YES.
Intel has become the "I've fallen and I can't get my production up" company. Let me put it another way, Intel is behaving like AMD did in the "old days". They can't seem to do anything right in their core business. They seem much better at the moment in generating "other income", I wonder if they need all that "other income" to offset shortfalls in the core business?

Take a good hard look at the situation. Something's wrong at Intel and while at the same time AMD is on a gravy train to Fat City(tm-KapKan4u)!!!

CrazyMan



To: Elmer who wrote (116812)6/21/2000 3:14:00 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1571398
 
crazyoldman, consider the situation. Intel's current 6th generation processor is neck 'n neck with AMD's newest 7th+ generation processor at 1 GHz. Intel has spent 4-5 years developing a new generation processor. Someone has suggested that it might be no faster than a 550MHz Celeron. You think I might be gullible for suggesting that this is ridiculous? Is this really the position you want to take?

Elmer,

You are confusing speed with volume...you can crank up cumine but you can only produce enough to satisfy Dell. Intel's 6th generation is whipped and needs some rest.

But you know that; so give the bull a rest as well.

ted