SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PROLIFE who wrote (21100)6/21/2000 3:54:00 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Bush - No. Gore - No. Not much of an issue when both candidates agree. Besides, it's not a Federal matter.

Me? Not a valid question. My state doesn't have a death penalty.

I wonder who on this thread would be in favor of a moratorium on death sentences until further notice....



To: PROLIFE who wrote (21100)6/21/2000 4:16:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
No, I don't think so.....



To: PROLIFE who wrote (21100)6/21/2000 5:18:00 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
death penalty

cnn.com

The thing about the death penalty is that if you screw up you don't have a second chance (unless your in Florida I guess).

The biggest problem is that it negates the argument that killing is wrong. It becomes who gets to kill, how pre-meditated does it have to be before it's legitimate, and how much abuse are you allowed to heap on the victim before they are killed.

It's not much of a deterrent, otherwise we wouldn't have all these murderers waiting in line for their needles. It only seems a deterent to those not inclined to get themselves into that situation anyway.

It's used as a sideshow after the fact. There's something fundamentally wrong with waiting for crimes to happen and then using maximum penalty and not expending more effort to stop the crimes in the first place. (Like making the guy's handgun a bit harder to get in the first place).
TP



To: PROLIFE who wrote (21100)6/21/2000 6:10:00 PM
From: haqihana  Respond to of 769667
 
Dan, No! Especially since the "until further notice" is too vague.

~;=;o --haqi