Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldsheet who wrote (55089)	6/24/2000 1:20:00 PM
From: Tom Byron	Respond to of 116762

bob: any chance you have an update of that long term chart going back, to i think, the early 1970's where it shows gold, platinum and paladium on the same chart page...if ya do, would appreciate your posting here at si.... thanks. i have delusions of gold playing catch up with platinum and paladium....:))

To: goldsheet who wrote (55089)	6/24/2000 2:16:00 PM
From: PaulM	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 116762

OT <<it will be exciting if you make stuff up that isn't the actual news story>> <<'couple this with a bill proposing a suit against OPEC allowing the seizure of its assets' Nothing in the news story says that>> BILL WILL ALLOW ANTITRUST SUITS AGAINST OPEC "The bill would allow judges to seize OPEC's American assets, according to an aide to the congressman." cnn.com Sorry Bob, from now on I'll make sure every word I write is a verabtim quote from an official news agency. I'll also make sure to not draw the most obvious impications of a news story--like, the only practical way a judgement against a foreign entity can be enforced is by seizure of its local assets. <<standard political posturing using executive orders>> I am not an expert on exeutive Orders (something tells me you're not either), but I doubt declarations of national emergency are "standard." the Order actually blocks others from seizing Russian assets, rather than allowing the US seizure of Russian assets, as we both suggested, so I (we) misspoke. But you'll have to forgive me--what I try to focus on with my postings at this forum is to provide objective links allowing others draw their own conclusions, so I spend as little time as possible on my own commentary. The hope is that the forum isn't rendered useless as an informaton source by endless subjective bantering. (Of course, I'm only one person).

To: goldsheet who wrote (55089)	6/24/2000 3:33:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 116762

Standard political posturing using executive orders. Not all assets, just assets related to one program: Now Bob, don't be bursting the goldbug's bubbles. Even though you and I know that the EO only deals with assets associated with the HEU agreement, including uranium already be processed that we have now apparently seized, the "bugs" need something they can perceive as catastrophic in order to get their hopes up. Now why you and I, but not "The Privateer", were able to discern the boilerplate nature of that EO, is symptomatic of their creed. Regards, Ron