Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (46005)	6/25/2000 2:15:00 AM
From: Pat Hughes	Respond to of 93625

OT OT Or....Before he gets the chance to finish the first sentence, You blow his brains out and bury him in the basement.

To: Scumbria who wrote (46005)	6/25/2000 12:16:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Does anyone have any examples of some recent sweeping patents that were issued and successfully challenged (and tossed?). The wacko patents we have in software are holding. For example, if this technology were found to be used in mainframes from misc. manufacturers prior to 1990, would that be grounds to overturn the rambus patent? I'm long rambus - just trying to clarify some legal issues here. thx

To: Scumbria who wrote (46005)	6/25/2000 8:45:00 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Scumbria LET LOOSE. You keep forgetting that Hitachi STOLE from RAMBUS. They admitted it. They would not have settled so early if it were not true! Now Micron is in the same boat. TOUGH SHIT FOR MICRON. Did you feel the same about QCOMs patents. Patents protect the little guy from the likes of thieves like Hitachi and Micron. Hitachi just admitted to being a thief. Micron will to, in due time.