Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric Wells who wrote (105478)	6/26/2000 8:23:00 PM
From: KevRupert	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Eric, I agree with your thoughts. What I don't agree with is people (i.e. Sarmad) who come on here and state that Amazon is going to zero - with no justification. If someone is going to bother writing info on the thread, it would seem like a person could state why it's going to zero. I was responding to this comment by Sarmad, To: Danny who wrote (105318) From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz Saturday, Jun 24, 2000 2:48 PM ET Reply # of 105522 >> Maybe and maybe not. But anyway, I will not look into AMZN until several months later. Danny, I thought you had these scams figured out pretty well. But I guess even the more nimble players get caught sometimes. Hopefully you can get out without much damage, though it looks pretty bleak right now. I think punching out at zero is the most likely outcome for Amazon (the company and the stock). I agree with your comments that analysts write positive comments regardless of the stock. This is a given. But to write, as Sarmad does above, that Amazon is a scam and going to zero - without any justification - is inappropriate. If you find it enlightening, so be it. Positive or negative, explain your reasoning if making a comment that a stock is a scam or going to zero. Is this asking to much? What is an appropriate name to refer to someone as - if not a cockroach - when they write such comments?