SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (21655)6/27/2000 10:19:00 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
I have serious problems with the death penalty but fear of frying an innocent person isn't one of them:

Ann Coulter -
By the time they were finished with the Bedau-Radelet Study, Markman and Cassell were able to state without contradiction: There is no documented case of a factually innocent person being executed for at least the past 50 years.

Nor is there likely to be. Probably 99.9 percent of defendants convicted of murder are guilty. Less than 1 percent of all convicted murderers will receive the death penalty. We could triple the number of murderers sentenced to death without ever executing an innocent man.

jewishworldreview.com



To: Bill who wrote (21655)6/27/2000 1:48:00 PM
From: Father Terrence  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
If a system were established that guaranteed 100% accuracy, then execution becomes a valid option. My concern is not for the rights of the guilty, they have none, it is for the rights of the innocent who are trapped in a terribly flawed system.

Personally, I would not employ the electric chair, guillotine, noose, dunking, stoning or firing squad -- all of those smack of cruel and unusual punishment. Lethal injection seems to be the best alternative at this point in time.

Perhaps in the future we will be able to do a brain wipe and give them a new identity and personality.

And, why just 'him'? -- there are women too.