Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Captain Jack who wrote (83083)	6/29/2000 8:24:00 PM
From: Captain Jack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Please-- lets have no tension amongest ourselves,SSB & MC do that well enough, LOL! So far cpq has not warned and it looks like it will not. My guess is the guy from SSB got wind of a lot of investment selling and figured (possibly correctly) cpq needed that to make the consensus. As I have said for a year and Rude pointed out cpq is not really an investment but a trading issue. It is certainly not worth a long term hold and the institutions that bailed over a year ago are reinforcing that by not coming back. The shi!!y rep they have is well deserved and goes back years. How could most everyone NOT believe anything horrible about them? BAD is expected! MC is trying hard to learn but is way behind the curve when it comes to WS and shareholder equity! It is hard to believe he gives a damn (why should he as his holdings were bought with a grant from cpq, not his money). I can agree El. 31 by 4/10 2001,,, maybe LOL! Actually my prediction the beginning of this year was around 31 1/2 on Dec 31 this year,, could still happen. They seem to have one mgr in Greene,, now if we just had a real ceo,, one without training wheels,,, maybe Carly will give lessons? If so let me know as I want privately tutored,, LOl! Just normal crap in the life of comcrap.