SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (83274)6/29/2000 9:20:00 PM
From: CharleyMike  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
No, thanks.

See Message 13971627

You're more than likely correct.



To: epicure who wrote (83274)6/30/2000 2:36:58 AM
From: nihil  Respond to of 108807
 
Yes, okay, but there is evidence in several states (such as Massachusetts) that sex offense authorities refused to prosecute female on male child sex offenses because they refused to believe that such things existed. In the 1880's Queen Victoria refused to sign off on a bill making lesbianism an offense because she refused to believe there was any such thing.
Women for attacking children sexually is a very modern crime.
canoe.ca


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News