SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockHawk who wrote (27390)7/7/2000 10:21:37 AM
From: gdichaz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
StockHawk: Understood.

In no way was I throwing any asparagus your way.

I used your post only as a way to try to help others here see a little bit through some of the huge fog bank out there.

And I agree that you were right. That story and others like it are why Qualcomm has taken a stock price hit.

The other fun and games negative story is on Korea aiming for zero imports of "parts" for CDMA phones by next June.

Suggest some salt needs to be sprinkled on that too.

Best.

Cha2
..



To: StockHawk who wrote (27390)7/7/2000 3:07:38 PM
From: ratan lal  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 54805
 
I thought the wording regarding W-CDMA, indicating that QCOM had virtually nothing to do with it was outrageous

Unless QCOM comes out and 'explicitly' makes the cliam that they are entitled to royalties on all applications of WCDMA, the market is going to view this report as QCOM NOT receiving any royalties.

This has and continues to be a 'confusing' issue and it is up to QCOM to clear it up.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News