Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (105369)	7/8/2000 5:03:43 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Tony, Despite the mislabeling, we agree that the author's fundamental premise is correct? 820/PC800 DRDRAM is slower than 815/PC133. Scumbria

To: Tony Viola who wrote (105369)	7/8/2000 7:48:12 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 186894

Re: "As I pointed out on the "spinoff" AMD thread, the author of that article took all the trouble to pick the data off Intel's web pages, wrote the article, and then mislabeled the comparison columns (bigger is better on these benches, right?)." He also has incorrect data. Just one example is the Spec2000 scores which he claims are for a 933MHz CuMine are the exact scores posted on the SPEC website for 1GHz CuMines. A poor job of editing by the author to say the least but to Intel's credit at least for publishing the data. EP