SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Philosopher who wrote (83702)7/12/2000 10:14:10 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Religion is more like philosophy. Which indeed one CAN argue about- but in the end one can neither prove nor really disprove much of anything. It is not really very much like science. Everyone wants the aura of science without the rigor of it's intellectual discipline- well you can't have the mantel without the restrictions. Sorry, religion is NOT science.

With science you can at least throw things out. If I say gravity does not exist, I can be proven wrong. If I say God does not exist I cannot be proven wrong. If I say he DOES exist I cannot be proven wrong. We could argue about it forever- and indeed the course of human history is full of arguments about God(s), with, it seems to me, very little progress. Science, on the other hand, has progressed quite dramatically.



To: The Philosopher who wrote (83702)7/12/2000 10:17:20 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I don't read theological journals. I don't think very many religious people do either. I wonder how much influence the debates of theologians really have on religion as it is practiced.

The basic premise of religion is that some things must be accepted on faith.

The basic premise of science is that nothing should be accepted on faith.

Hard to reconcile the two.