Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (120262)	7/13/2000 10:09:15 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583342

Scumbria, Answer to you post on the "moderated" thread: My greatest accomplishment at my current job has been managing my management into realistic schedules. I may write a book on it someday. If you do, I would like to buy it. Joe

To: Scumbria who wrote (120262)	7/13/2000 1:35:50 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1583342

SCUMbria - Re: "Another interesting coincidence is that I used to babysit the guy who wrote the article you referenced." You did? How long ago was that? Paul

To: Scumbria who wrote (120262)	7/13/2000 10:22:11 PM
From: NightOwl	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1583342

Can anyone here tell me whether or not there are technical design reason's for INTC to design a 400MHz FSB into the P4? Would 266 or 332MHz have presented some sort of timing quagmire? Or was it chosen just to pressure AMD and push development of DRDRAM/DDR-II? And does Foster carry the same FSB data rate? If so, what will it do for memory before DDR II gets here? Does massive memory reduce the need for speed on the FSB? I would have thought just the reverse. 0\|0 P.S. Yes that's a bunch of stupid questions, but what do you expect from a lurker?