Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ddl who wrote (26213)	7/14/2000 8:44:12 AM
From: MrsNose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

Wasn't there something abour water permits that would limit capacity? I can't recall either, have to go digging. All the best, Margie

To: ddl who wrote (26213)	7/15/2000 12:07:33 PM
From: .Trev	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26850

Not true! The hints were there if you had the wit to see them. Lot's goes on in a venture like this that doesn't get hammered home. I reported in a post on the meeting that the drawing shown there had a title block that said "3000 Tonne CASE", and don't ask me to find it because I don't archive my words, I only think about them before I say (orprint) them. Cheers

To: ddl who wrote (26213)	7/15/2000 3:42:28 PM
From: maintenance	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

Hey bud, you won't find it in a news release. I think at one point they did talk about the possibility of ramping up from 3000. What you have to consider is why. It is essentially capital availability. That is not necessarily a considerations for a potential buyer. Environmental issues can be dealt with by throwing more money into it. I spoke to RT, they had no intention of mining snap. It is a last option. They are an exploration company. They will mine it if they can't sell it. $4.25 is the same as can't sell it. $4.25 is so low it is not even a joke. Look for high 30's. Cheers.