Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StillHolding who wrote (3237)	7/14/2000 6:40:45 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 30051

Thanks for the compliments, make sure Johnson does not see these. The holy One is VLNC, a very nice start up company said to be on the verge to go into mass production. It is so named since derogatory statements (namely an opinion that in the short or long term VLNC may not be the best current choice) are met with a barrage of irrelevant posts from certain parties, and an organized lynch on the VLNC thread. Since some zealots are doing daily search for mentions of VLNC here on SI so as to balance whatever statements in my posts (actually, not whatever, only cautionary statements or even "red flag present" declarations) with their wise comments, I have decided to avoid their wrath by not mentioning VLNC but term it the "holy one". Once they catch up with this, I will shift to another acronym like "CNLV" (an inversion) trying to stay ahead of the game and not having to wonder what were all the ingored posts about (deciphering the original ignored posts from other threader's comments is far from an exact science, if not dangerous). I hope this is the last we go over this issue. By the way, despite some weakness today, the holy one is still under a full fledged green flag. My own SL, however has been raised to $20.375. Zeev

To: StillHolding who wrote (3237)	7/14/2000 10:49:22 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

Still Holding: It's a bit tough to read Zeevs' true Valence intentions....Today he calls Valence "a very nice start up company".....Take a look below at the differing opinion Zeev had a few months back....absolutely nothing has changed with the company outlook in the last few months as a matter of fact it seems we've been in a news void.... Zeev calling for Valence to be $65 to $70 by May 2000...http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=12871213 Here's Zeev interpreting that the Valence shorters are winning???? Message 13530193 Zeev recommending Valence on his "stocks to short list"...http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=13613953 Here is Zeev commenting on Valences business strategy....http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=13883362 (something he knows nothing about because he never talks to management it affects his "rational deliberations"....http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=10399324 ) Here we have Zeev saying a few weeks ago "If good news about shipments and profits were imminent, the market would have smelled it before,IMHO.".....stock is up $7 the last two weeks??? Message 13922104 .....and today we have ""a very nice start up company" Truth be told, nobody really knows what Zeev really thinks about Valence.....it looks like he really can't make up his mind......Seems like one day long the other day short....Oh well.... Regards, MJ