Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ATI Technologies in 1997 (T.ATY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nikos Tsivranidis who wrote (5648)	7/15/2000 10:35:56 AM
From: Marc	Respond to of 5927

<<My only problem with you 18. You are paying too much attention to Marc. >> Nikos, maybe you are paying too much attention <ggg> Marc

To: Nikos Tsivranidis who wrote (5648)	7/16/2000 11:52:11 PM
From: OrionX	Respond to of 5927

To 18 and Nikos, Saying you called what happened to ATI is just like calling that a meteorite will hit the earth, someday. Well, what do you know, they have been hitting the earth in the past and they will in the future. So, what's your point? Anything is possible and all great companies eventually go through bad times one day or another. So, to say you called ATI, is a bunch of baloney. I didn't listen to you then cause you were wrong. And you're wrong again today. Hope you're short again cause you'll feel the pain all over again. If you have more to say, of an informative nature rather than to gloat for what you really didn't call, please do so.

To: Nikos Tsivranidis who wrote (5648)	7/17/2000 9:05:40 AM
From: SBHX	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5927

Nikos, in stocks, the timeframe pretty much determines whether you make money or not. You could be right about all your shorts/longs 2 years ago and still not make money. Or as someone once said, all things shall pass if you wait long enough. If you actually followed the contents of 18's posts vs marc's posts for the entire ati rise from around us$2(?) post-split-adjusted, you'll draw your own conclusions back then. The holes in the argument's really were one of content, logical inference and basic arithmetic. These discussion sites tend to have too many emotional charged accusations instead of people quietly trying to determine the actual worth of a company. If we all sit back and try to determine what is really important ? : 1. To be right. 2. To be profitable. I think there will be less of that I'm right you're wrong thing. What's the point? The game has moved on. There's bigger fish to fry.