To: Maurice Winn who wrote (76757 ) 7/16/2000 9:59:36 PM From: Z268 Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472 Maurice, Re:<Stephen, what thuggery have you experienced? That sounds like a devaluation of a word. Some here have threatened violence and that is thuggery.> For what it is worth, I did experience a cyber version of "being visited at night by men in brown", so to speak <vbg>. And no, I am not referring to you or Ramsey, so please don't get offended. RE:<The Q! Moderated thread is to avoid discussions like this one, which have been conducted, over, and over, and over, and over, and over again. It also keeps it leaner and meaner so people [all of us] can get the juicy bits in a short time, which we all like to do sometimes.> IMHO, moderated threads are a good idea, but it does not work well in practice, simply because it gives rise to unintended side-effects, e.g. some members think the rules become the raison d'etre, and others think it's "wave the little red Q!book society". In any case, I beg to differ on the supposedly superior intrinsic value of the Moderated Thread; personally, I have derived more value from the other Q threads, but then again, this is JMHO. However, I respect the collective wish for "a sort of a private club" <vbg again>, so in future I am happy to be just a reader of the Thread. I am reminded of what Gen Omar Bradley (or was it Karl Malden?) said to Patton (or was it George C. Scott?) in the movie: "George, there is one big difference between you and me. You are here because you love it, I'm here because it's my job!" Me, I'm here because I want to look after my investments, not because I am enamored of any technology or stock <bg>. May your investments prosper, and it's good to hear from the Land of the Long White Cloud. Best, Steve