Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pete Mason who wrote (7244)	7/20/2000 11:45:09 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Ah, GUMM, those were the days... So, a $4 million ad campaign to generate a $1.6 million increase in sales? Losing $2.7 million in the very prime of cold season? Nicht zer gut. Oh but look, they've got a patent. Maybe NEJM will publish them now.

To: Pete Mason who wrote (7244)	7/21/2000 11:51:59 AM
From: Mike M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Pretty well, Pete, thanks for asking.

To: Pete Mason who wrote (7244)	7/22/2000 9:55:01 AM
From: Hank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Pete, You have to remember two things here: 1) Big money pro's like Mike and Dan ALWAYS get into highly speculative stocks like GUMM at absolutely the lowest price. Therefore, they are always "ahead" no matter how low the price drops after a big run up. 2) Zicam sales are impressive and still skyrocketing from quarter to quarter no matter how much money the company loses. Just ask Dan and he'll spin the numbers to prove it.