Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kash johal who wrote (2390)	7/26/2000 3:29:53 PM
From: Pravin Kamdar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

I'm curious. How does one SI subscriber have the ability to keep anyone else from posting on a particular thread? Pravin.

To: kash johal who wrote (2390)	7/26/2000 3:48:28 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

kash, I hope we voting to suspend someone will be extremely rare. But when we do, I suggest that we: - keep the voting open for at least 2 days - when the voting is done, a tally of votes as well as who voted how should be posted. - people who are suspended at the time should not have a right to vote on anybody else during their suspension. - voting should be done via PM in order not to clutter the thread - escalation should be 3 private warnings followed by 1 public warnings by Mani, followed by a vote to suspend, which adds up to 5 offending posts before someone can be suspended - your suggestion of 2 week, 4 week life suspensions sound fine Joe

To: kash johal who wrote (2390)	7/26/2000 4:26:56 PM
From: kapkan4u	Respond to of 275872

<1. There should be a clear and pre-arranged "kick-off" mechanism. ie 4 warnings and 2 weeks.> You gotta be kidding. Tolerating the likes of winsock for 2 weeks. gimmi a break Kap