Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MythMan who wrote (7200)	7/30/2000 1:22:09 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

<<I've had enough of this juvenile sh*t for today. Off to beach toss down a few cold ones..>> Good idea. Oh well, Luc's been there before, and he'll be there again. He seems to be there more when the market is tanking for some reason<G>

To: MythMan who wrote (7200)	7/30/2000 1:58:03 PM
From: SI Bob	Read Replies (8) \| Respond to of 436258

I've been willing to overlook a certain amount of nastiness when it's confined to this thread (which I am now certain was a very bad mistake on my part), but have never been willing to overlook it when it infects other threads or is seemingly unprovoked. And your "juvenile sh*t" comment is interesting because that's also how I happen to view people telling others to "gfy". It's unwarranted in what should be civil discourse, and smacks of an inappropriate (IMO) attitude toward that discourse. Basically, people don't join into the discussions here to be told to go have carnal knowledge of themselves. And adding emoticons after such an attack doesn't excuse it in the least bit, contrary to common belief. I mistakenly thought that if I left those kinds of antics alone as long as they were confined to a single thread, there wouldn't be any problems. I trusted those involved to not try to stretch the limits. My mistake. And one I won't be repeating soon. Regards, SI Admin (Bob)