Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (56864)	7/31/2000 2:18:21 PM
From: Follies	Respond to of 116957

But he has done nothing illegal or unconstitutional as President. yeah, and OJ is innocent.

To: Rarebird who wrote (56864)	7/31/2000 2:26:35 PM
From: long-gone	Respond to of 116957

No, but he has. you on the east & left coasts want guns off the streets, get congress to let you spend the money for the buybacks. If the greenies want gold sold, get the laws past congress & the people. He doesn't want to talk about boinking Monica, fine, let him take the 5th. but lying under oath or spending money without authority of congress or simply manipulating the value of gold lower is outside the law. There are ways to do anything & ways not to, he has been useful only as a poor example.

To: Rarebird who wrote (56864)	7/31/2000 2:40:21 PM
From: terryswift	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116957

Apparently, you don't consider perjury and obstruction of justice illegal. Slick has already been held in contempt of court, and paid a $90,000 fine, for perjury. At some point in the future, when his appeals run out, he will also be disbarred from practicing law in his home state, again for perjury. I suspect several other states will follow suit. Not much you can legally do about a sitting president except impeach him and that's been done. His legacy is chiseled in stone... the most immoral, unethical, corrupt administration in this century, if not in history. You lefties have mighty low standards.

To: Rarebird who wrote (56864)	8/3/2000 8:09:25 AM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116957

OT <<But he has done nothing illegal or unconstitutional as President. >> Sorry, I said I didn't care a bit about his sexual relationships, I should have added the word "consensual": 8/02/00 10:55 p.m. Shays Shocker Clinton Raped Broaddrick Twice. By NR staff onnecticut Rep. Chris Shays said on a talk radio show Wednesday that, based on secret evidence he reviewed during the impeachment controversy, he believes President Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick, not once, but twice. Talk-show host Tom Scott of Clear Channel Broadcasting, New Haven (WELI 960) asked Shays about the mysterious impeachment "evidence room," prompting the GOP moderate to say that Broaddrick "disclosed that she had been raped, not once, but twice" to Judiciary Committee investigators. Shays, who is often hailed by the New York Times for his independent judgment and good sense, found the evidence compelling: "I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked point blank if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say that it way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick." ... nationalreview.com