SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: donald sew who wrote (26527)8/2/2000 8:36:48 AM
From: Gersh Avery  Respond to of 42787
 
Been a nice end of month, hasn't it ..



To: donald sew who wrote (26527)8/2/2000 9:33:03 AM
From: Chris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
i checked the ibd bull/bear sentiment.. no fear.



To: donald sew who wrote (26527)8/2/2000 9:36:48 AM
From: Chris  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42787
 
watch the sox 950 support.

actually a low poked to 934..



To: donald sew who wrote (26527)8/2/2000 10:46:10 AM
From: Arik T.G.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42787
 
>>Frankly, I think analysts should be more responsible for their recommendations.

ROFL.
I think leaders should be more responsible for their actions (tell that to Joseph Stallin, Sadam Hussein, Adolf Hitler, Idi Amin (sp?) and half the Roman emperors, and I just scraped the surface)

Bottom line -
1. They (the analysts) have a different agenda. Top priority is not the well being of J6P investment.
2. Like in most occupations - not all are good at it. My guess is that most of them are plain lucky. BTW I still ponder about Reagan- was he good at it or plain lucky?

Further BTW
GE looks like sh*t. What do your ST indicators say on it?

ATG



To: donald sew who wrote (26527)8/2/2000 12:38:50 PM
From: OX  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42787
 
>>analysts

some may be stupid, but most know who butters their bread.
what would happen if they all said in early March that all stocks were way overvalued? major hysteria, riots, panics. that would not be good for their business.
they want to fleece their sheep, but can't kill 'em off permanently.



To: donald sew who wrote (26527)8/2/2000 1:00:01 PM
From: KeepItSimple  Respond to of 42787
 
>I dont want to get into conspiracy theorys or more complicated issues,
>just trying to keep it simple

A man after my own namesake! :)



To: donald sew who wrote (26527)8/2/2000 5:20:32 PM
From: Dan Duchardt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
donald,

This might interest you.

Message 14146851

Perhaps it's going a bit too far beyond the fire-wall restrictions that supposedly exist between analysts and broker/dealers, but I think it would be really interesting if firms were restricted from trading against their analyst's recommendations for a period of time, at least several days. Imagine a firm issuing a hold recommendation being unable to buy or sell, or being unable to dump stock on the market after issuing a buy or accumulate recommendation.

Dan