SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mr. Pink's Picks: selected event-driven value investments -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (13822)8/2/2000 3:31:35 PM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18998
 
Kevin, I have been aware of a number of CEO's that have suffered margin calls against their holding and been sold out by their brokers. The two I recall offhand were the CEOs of FIBR and SOLV. So while it may be common practice for a high level exec to maintain shares away from the market, it is by no means the only manner of holding.

Regards,

Barb



To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (13822)8/2/2000 3:42:46 PM
From: F. Lynn  Respond to of 18998
 
" Is it or is it not standard practice for a company's insiders to withhold their core company holdings from the float, as Cramer says that he does, above? "

I would think, without being sure, that the most important issue is, do the insiders hold the shares in a margin account with a street broker? If so, they are probably being lent out without the insider's knowledge or approval. I doubt many actually ask their brokers not to lend them out. So I guess that the key variable becomes whether the insiders are holding shares in a brokerage account, or sticking them under the mattress.
I think most of the time with options, there is a brokerage firm handling the employee options, and anytime they are exercised the shares get rolled into an account with that broker.



To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (13822)8/2/2000 3:45:33 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Respond to of 18998
 
Many of them lend them out especially if the shares are used as collateral for a sale of convertible underlying shares as long as the convertible's shares have not been registered (Although I doubt that it is perfectly legal...to lend the $0.01 shares to short against...but if it is done by a formally unrelated party why bother).

What remains is that this new version of "call in your certs" stinks.