Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (106818)	8/3/2000 4:38:12 AM
From: Eric K.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: The guy has no credibility This is well demonstrated by the RDRAM v. SDRAM benchmarks Tom posted a month before Intel. -Eric

To: Paul Engel who wrote (106818)	8/3/2000 9:50:48 AM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, What proof do you have that the part sent to Tom PabstSmear wasn't working properly when he received it? The part works at <850MHz, but not at any higher speeds. This is an indication of a speed problem, rather than a defect. Had the part been mishandled, the symptoms would be non-functional, rather than slow. To suggest that Tom damaged the part is absurd. The bozo spent one day ranting and raving about a BIOS MICROCODE Issue - then the next day retracted that accusation - saying that a BIOS/Microcode issues wasn't the problem. He made the mistake of giving Intel the benefit of the doubt. That will teach him. You are grasping at straws. Scumbria