SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (106829)8/3/2000 10:09:35 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: "The part works at <850MHz, but not at any higher speeds. This is an indication of a speed problem, rather than a defect. Had the part been mishandled, the symptoms would be non-functional, rather than slow. To suggest that Tom damaged the part is absurd."

Maybe Tom tried soldering something? Anyway, it's obvious from his refusal to return the part that he's done something to it. It would be so easy to clear this up but only a guilty man would accuse a company then refuse to show the part.

You probably believed Clinton.

EP



To: Scumbria who wrote (106829)8/3/2000 10:22:29 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
SCUMbria - re: "To suggest that Tom damaged the part is absurd."

Why ?

His sit-on-the-potty-and-pout refusal to return the part to Intel is almost an ADMISSION by this jack ass that he mucked up the part and doesn't want Intel to discover what a screw up he is.

Pure and simple.

On the bright side, I hear Uberclockermeister will be doing an extensive test on a few thousand Dupalons that have "suddenly" become available to him !

Paul


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News