Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gancho who wrote (4103)	8/4/2000 11:06:24 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 30051

gancho, do me a favor, I have this man on "ignore" so I need not waste my time reading his crass language, don't bring him here through the back door. You read my original post, I am not casting negative innuendos, I am quite clear about my current position. The last quarter was a disappointment to me, and apparently, so far, to the market. Luckily, I obeyed my turnips and got out just above $20 so I do not have to agonize here and mull a possible sell decision if the technical picture deteriorates further. If tomorrow the market tells me that this assessment is wrong, I will turn around and change my stance, I see no virtue, particularly on a "channel trading" thread in strong perpetual opinions. How come no one from the CDTS or HAUP threads are here complaining about the fact that I have changed my opinion on these stocks? They used to be stellar performer, and for some time now I have been warning of their decline, is that wrong to get out of CDTS at $20 plus to buy back here around $11? Maybe it is, but that is what most posters to this thread are discussing. While you and many other holders may feel they owe some special loyalty to a company or its stock, many on this thread do not think in term of "loyal shareholder" or being in love with a stock. As the circumstances change, our investment opinion change as well, not just on the holy one, on many other situations as well. We rarely agree with each other, but we do not use derogatory terms (lapdog? what is this anyhow), or engage in character assassination to prove our arguments. I will not respond to additional proding on this subjects and once more would appreciate of you keep that gentleman posts out. That is what the "ignore" function is for. Zeev

To: gancho who wrote (4103)	8/5/2000 3:19:36 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Respond to of 30051

gancho, the purpose of our discussions of the holy one on this thread is not to prove or disprove anything. Why do you see it as our responsibility to "expose facts with holy management?" On this thread, we discuss our opinions as to whether it makes sense to own the holy stock or any other stock at any particular time. If the holy disciples are offended that some people don't want to own the holy stock 100% of the time, that's their problem.